Letters: Missing data | Runaway bureaucracy | CalWORKs cuts | State accountability | U.N. peacekeeping

Submit your letter to the editor via this form. Read more Letters to the Editor.

Story leaves out critical
data on college cost

Re: “Is higher education worth the money?” (Page B1, May 12).

It’s great that the study focuses on low- and moderate-income learners and actual typical cost and long-term salaries, but the results aggregate programs and outcomes in a way that distorts some of the key conclusions. The mounting cost of traditional four-year college programs can take years to offset for those who don’t pursue the most lucrative careers.

By not breaking down fields of study and specific credentials, the report misses a valuable opportunity to provide actionable guidance for these students into pathways for the goal of “a financially secure future.” As an example, California is reimagining its Master Plan for Career Education, which involves career technical education, apprenticeships, and other avenues that can combine with college to provide both return on investment and access to careers without being saddled with debt, depending on the careers that learners choose.

Rick Rafey
Santa Clara

VTA has become
a runaway bureaucracy

Re: “BART extension will not receive needed scrutiny” (Page A8, May 12).

A friend of mine worked as an intern for the city of San Jose when they were considering light rail. A consultant from the federal government told them that light rail wouldn’t work in San Jose. For one thing, people who live more than two miles from a light rail station won’t use light rail. What made more sense for San Jose was to expand bus transit. It’s a lot cheaper to build bus stops than lay track and build light rail stations, and routes can be adjusted to meet demand.

VTA no longer tracks the cost of operating light rail separate from bus transit. Check their annual report.

VTA has become a bureaucracy with a permanent funding stream from sales tax revenues. They are no longer accountable to taxpayers. You would think that some elected officials would be able to hold them accountable for poor management.

Tom Ferro
San Jose

CalWORKs cuts would
hurt women most

Re: “Newsom: State has $27 billion shortfall” (Page A1, May 11).

Gov. Gavin Newsom recently presented a revised budget plan, in response to ongoing financial challenges faced by the state. The budget plan includes cuts to the CalWORKs employment services.

As a social work graduate student, I strongly oppose the budget cuts to the employment services offered by CalWORKs in consideration of the current high child care expenses and gender inequality.

According to a 2022 U.S. Census Bureau survey, high child care costs in states like California lead many women to leave their jobs to care for young children. This trend is exacerbated by the gender pay gap, and it’s harder for women to re-enter the workforce after a career gap. The situation is even more challenging for low-income single mothers.

Yunsung Shin
Cupertino

State programs are
ripping off taxpayers

Re: “Politicians keep shifting blame on homelessness” (Page A9, May 12).

Thank you for publishing the article and the data provided therein: $24 billion spent serving 180,000 homeless in the last five years. Some quick math shows that is over $130,000 per homeless person, yet I doubt that the homeless or the taxpayers in the affected communities have seen much impact from these funds. Where has the money gone? What individuals or corporations have benefited from it? How much useless and redundant bureaucracy has been created to siphon our taxes from the intended beneficiaries?

The homeless industrial complex now joins the bullet train debacle as a taxpayer money pit. The California taxpayers deserve better management of their tax dollars, and the homeless deserve better treatment. It’s time for the press and voters to step up and hold their elected officials accountable.

Jeff Muralt
San Jose

U.N. must take firmer
hand in peacekeeping

After World War I, the League of Nations was established as a means of resolving international conflict. It failed to control Japan (Manchuria/China), Italy (Abyssinia/Ethiopia), and Germany (Sudetenland/Czechoslovakia, then Poland). This led to World War II.

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor |


Letters: Who owns name? | Corporate partners | Dictating health | Monument expansion | Closed eyes | Gaza conflict

Letters to the Editor |


Letters: Help homeless | Retail theft

Letters to the Editor |


Letters: Name change | Wrong message | Copay accumulators | Net neutrality | Real history | ‘War on Hamas’

Letters to the Editor |


Letters: Small businesses | Children’s welfare | Court’s hypocrisy | Social Security | Women’s rights

Letters to the Editor |


Letters: Expanding access | Subjugating women | Stop Trump | Prisoner swap | Embrace differences

The United Nations had done better until lately. We now have Middle East crises in Gaza, Palestine, Israel and Yemen, and the invasion of Ukraine by Russia.

The U.N. needs to get involved and use every method within its powers, including suspension of membership and forceful intervention as necessary. The alternative is World War III.

While the diplomats begin pressing their case, the rest of us should be doing everything possible to avert the coming catastrophe. For instance, history teachers should be reminding everyone of the consequences of not heeding the lessons of history.

We should all be preparing for the worst if these efforts fail. We must prevent World War III.

John Cormode
Mountain View

You May Also Like

More From Author