Gov. Gavin Newsom on Sunday vetoed what would have been the most comprehensive artificial intelligence regulatory bill.
A day before the deadline to take action or allow the bill to become law, Newsom rejected SB 1047, the Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act, citing the burdens it would place on AI companies and criticism that the bill’s scope was too broad.
“While well-intentioned, SB 1047 does not take into account whether an AI system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data,” Newsom said in a statement. “Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions — so long as a large system deploys it. I do not believe this is the best approach to protecting the public from real threats posed by the technology.”
In other words, Newsom believes the law fails to distinguish between AI systems used in high-risk environments and those used for basic tasks. He said the bill lacks nuance in differentiating all types of AI within large systems, regardless of their function.
Related Articles
OpenAI looks to shift away from nonprofit roots and convert itself to for-profit company
Magid: For Meta, the future is even smarter glasses
Billionaire battle: Musk blasts Khosla over Martins Beach, curses him on social media
Apple gets EU warning to open up iPhone operating system
GM’s Cruise to resume robotaxi testing in Bay Area this fall
The bill would have compelled AI companies to take safety measures to protect the public from cyberattacks, prevent AI from being used to develop weapons and to prevent automated crime. It would have required companies to implement safety testing of large AI products, costing at least $100 million to develop, and to enable a “kill switch” on new AI technology.
The bill’s main author, Scott Wiener, said in a statement Sunday, “This veto is a setback for everyone who believes in oversight of massive corporations that are making critical decisions that affect the safety and welfare of the public and future of the planet.”
The bill has moved at a swift pace, having been introduced only in February. It quickly polarized Silicon Valley and Washington, D.C.
Despite the strong opposition from California’s robust tech sector, last month, the bill passed in the state Senate 29-9 and in the Assembly by a 41-9 vote.
Tech giants such as Meta, Google and OpenAI fiercly opposed the bill and lobbied against it in the state legislature, saying the bill would stifle AI innovation.
Meanwhile, the bill prompted democratic lawmakers to take the rare move to meddle in Sacramento business, given the national implications the bill would have had.
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, San Francisco Mayor London Breed and Silicon Valley Reps. Ro Khanna and Zoe Lofgren, all spoke out in opposition the bill. While they agreed that regulations are needed, they calleed Wiener’s AI bill the wrong approach.
The pushback came even after several amendments sought by the bill’s earlier critics, including AI startup Anthropic, were added.
Wiener agreed to cut criminal penalties from the bill and removed the creation of a new regulatory body, the Frontier Model Division, among other changes.
After Anthropic changed tune and came out to support the bill, surprisingly, so did the usually regulation-averse Tesla CEO and X owner Elon Musk.
Meta, who remained opposed to the bill despite the amendments, said it was pleased Newsom vetoed the bill.
“We are pleased that Governor Newsom vetoed SB1047. This bill would have stifled AI innovation, hurt business growth and job creation, and broken the state’s long tradition of fostering open-source development,” a Meta spokesperson said. “We support responsible AI regulations and remain committed to partnering with lawmakers to promote better approaches.”
Teri Olle, Director of Economic Security California Action, a co-sponsor of the legislation, said the veto “ignores overwhelming public support for accountability of big tech.”
“Governor Newsom’s veto of SB 1047 forfeits our country’s most promising opportunity to implement responsible guardrails around the development of AI today,” Olle said. “The failure of this bill demonstrates the enduring power and influence of the deep pocketed tech industry, driven by the need to maintain the status quo – a hands-off regulatory environment and exponential profit margins.”
While Wiener was disappointed by the governo’r veto, he said that the debate around the bill has elevated the conversation around the need for AI safety measures. ”
“At the same time, the debate around SB 1047 has dramatically advanced the issue of AI safety on the international stage. Major AI labs were forced to get specific on the protections they can provide to the public through policy and oversight,” Wiener said. “The work of this incredible coalition will continue to bear fruit as the international community contemplates the best ways to protect the public from the risks presented by AI. California will continue to lead in that conversation — we are not going anywhere.”
Refresh for updates. This is a developing story
