SAN JOSE — The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority filed a legal complaint Tuesday against Amalgamated Transit Union Local 265 for allegedly violating a “no strike” clause in their collective bargaining agreement as the union’s continued to push for higher wages and other benefits.
VTA filed the complaint in the Santa Clara County Superior Court with the aim of bringing the strike to a swift end, according to a statement from the agency.
Related Articles
Two picketers injured in collision with vehicle on first day of VTA strike
As VTA strike begins, Santa Clara County commuters seek alternate transit options
VTA union members set to strike for the first time Monday; disputes over wages, arbitration stick in negotiations
VTA commuters urged to make backup plans as possible strike looms
San Jose BART extension: VTA still needs millions of dollars in savings to bring project in under budget
“This strike is having an overwhelming impact on the community, and we are working on all efforts to support our riders getting to work, school, medical appointments, and events,” said Carolyn Gonot, general manager and CEO of VTA, in a statement. “VTA is an integral part of the transportation network for Santa Clara County and the region overall. Getting our buses and trains rolling is imperative.”
ATU members walked off the job Monday after seven months negotiations ended in an impasse last week. The union is pushing for higher pay amid concerns of the cost of living and high inflation.
The district has said it serves some 100,000 passengers per day.
The union is seeking a 6% raise per year over three years and wants to add a clause guaranteeing arbitration for contract disputes. VTA’s last and best contract offer in negotiations would give workers a 9% raise over three years.
It was not immediately clear early Tuesday afternoon when the matter might be heard by a judge.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
